News in the
golf world never seems to take a nap in 2013. Every week is laced with some
intense, high powered issue and this week has been no exception.
Vijay Singh
was relieved from any wrongdoing in the case of his use of deer antler spray by
the PGA TOUR. After considerable review by the TOUR, and Commissioner Tim
Finchem, it was deemed that Singh had not violated the TOUR’s substance abuse
policy.
The World
Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has determined that the use of deer antler spray is
not considered prohibited. Based on that information, and given WADA’s lead
role in interpreting the Prohibited List, the TOUR deemed it only fair to no
longer treat Singh’s use of deer antler spray as a violation of the TOUR’s
anti-doping program.
Singh has
cooperated with the TOUR investigation and has been completely forthcoming and
honest. During his Tuesday press conference, Finchem emphasized that the TOUR
is committed to increasing its educational initiatives to remind players of the
PGA TOUR Anti-Doping Program and the risk of utilizing any product without full
understanding of the ingredients contained in that product.
Ironically,
Singh withdrew from this week’s Wells Fargo Championship at Quail Hollow this
week in Charlotte due to an ailing shoulder.
On
Wednesday, the USGA and R&A released a statement on the handling of the
Tiger Woods’ drop on Hole 15 during the second round of the Masters. This
situation raised two questions of interpretation under the Rules of Golf.
1. The Ruling that Woods Dropped In and
Played From a Wrong Place
The Rules do
not define “as nearly as possible” in terms of a specific measured distance,
because the conditions unique to each situation can affect how near to the
original spot it is possible to drop a ball and because dropping a ball is an
imprecise act. But, in this type of situation, in which the original spot was
clearly identifiable as being just behind the back edge of the divot hole
created by Woods’ previous stroke and the fact there were no other unusual
circumstances, “as nearly as possible” means that the player must attempt to
drop the ball on or next to (but not nearer the hole than) that spot. Woods did
not do so. As a result, he was correctly penalized two strokes for dropping in
and playing from a wrong place.
2. The Decision to Waive the Penalty of
Disqualification
In deciding
to waive the disqualification penalty for signing an incorrect scorecard, the
Committee recognized that it had talked to Woods- before he returned his
scorecard- about his drop on the 15th hole. About the Committee’s
ruling, the Committee likely would have corrected that ruling and concluded
that Woods had dropped in and played from a wrong place. In that case, he would
have returned a correct score of 8 for the 15th hole and the issue
of disqualification would not have arisen.
The
Decisions on the Rules of Golf authorize a Committee to correct an incorrect
decision before the competition has closed. They establish where a Committee
incorrectly advises a competitor, before he returns his scorecard, that he has
incurred no penalty. Then the Committee subsequently corrects its mistake and
it is appropriate for the Committee to waive the disqualification penalty.
The Masters
Tournament Committee concluded that its actions taken prior to Woods’ returning
his scorecard created an exceptional individual case that unfairly led to the
potential for disqualification. In hindsight, the Committee determined that its
initial ruling was incorrect, as well as that it had erred in
resolving this question without first seeking information from Woods. Then
they failed to inform Woods of the ruling.
As part of
this ongoing assessment, and in keeping with its regular practice, the Rules of
Golf Committees of the USGA and the R&A will review the exceptional
situation that occurred at the 2013 Masters Tournament, assess the potential
implications for other types of situations, and determine whether any
adjustment to the Rules and/or Decisions is appropriate.
Let the
implementation and execution of the rules rest with the governing bodies. But,
I will maintain that as a player, Tiger Woods acted appropriately. I don’t
recall seeing a situation in any other sport when an athlete would correct a
ball or strike by an umpire; a referee’s flag or a line judge’s call.
Finally,
Tianlang Guan was offered sponsor’s exemption for the upcoming Byron Nelson
Classic this month in Dallas. Some in the media have been critical of giving
the 14-year old Chinese player exemptions into PGA TOUR events such as the one
he received in last week’s Zurich event in New Orleans. Are you kidding me?
Guan made
the cut at The Masters and then shot a second round 69 en route to making the
cut at New Orleans. He has indicated that he will attempt to qualify for the
U.S. Open. It has been the most refreshing story in golf for the past month. A
14-year old who can compete with the world’s best players. Let this madness
continue!
No comments:
Post a Comment